UPDATE: The Montgomery City Council did not take action on a proposed animal ordinance at its April 4, 2022 meeting. It will likely be on the agenda of the April 19th meeting. This gives resident animal owners additional time to continue contacting city council members to state concerns with the proposed ordinance.
As previously reported, among numerous overreaching and problematic provisions in the proposed ordinance:
• It would be unlawful to engage in the business of breeding, buying, selling, training, raising, or boarding animals without obtaining a special permit issued by the Montgomery Humane Society at cost of $150 per year. To obtain a permit, the applicant must have a valid business license issued by the city; provide proof of liability insurance for animal bites, injury, or death caused by an animal; and provide veterinary records for all animals that enter or leave their care within the 12 months prior to the date of application. Inspections of premises would be authorized prior to issuance of a permit, on any renewal, and on any complaint. “Animal Business” and “business venture” are undefined, so it is assumed that all of these activities would require a permit, such as the sale of a single animal or conducting animal training on a volunteer basis.
• An amended section of the proposed ordinance appears to be intended to address animal fighting. However, as written, it would make it unlawful to promote, hold, or attend a game, exhibition, . . . or contest involving one or more animals or involving animals and humans. This could serve to outlaw dog shows, 4-H events, and other events involving animals. This section also does not conform with a separate section that allows tethering of dogs in conjunction with certain events. Therefore, it is unclear which provision would prevail.
• Both reasonable and overreaching/vague animal care provisions are proposed. For example, it would be an animal cruelty crime to fail to provide medical treatment to “any” animal that is sick, diseased, injured, or suffering from any type of parasitic infestation. It is unclear if an owner, rather than a veterinarian, would be permitted to provide appropriate care for an animal.
• It would be a crime to fail to “properly groom” an animal, which specifically would include “cutting or maintaining the animal’s hair to an optimum length and condition appropriate to the animals’ breed.” The proposed ordinance does not define “optimum length” or “appropriate condition.”
Enforcement of these and other problematic requirements would no longer be conducted by the city police department. The Montgomery Humane Society would be responsible for enforcement of Chapter 4, Animals, of the Code of Ordinances; all existing, amended, proposed, and future provisions of the chapter; and would be empowered to confiscate animals.
WHAT YOU CAN DO
Animal owners in Montgomery are urged to:
- Review the proposed ordinance.
- Continue contacting the mayor and city council members to express concerns.
- Attend the city council meeting on April 19, 2022 to voice opposition to problematic sections of the proposed ordinance. For additional meeting information and to learn how to sign up to be recognized to speak, contact the City Clerk’s office at 334-625-2195.
If you are not directly receiving AKC’s legislative alerts by email, you can click here to sign up. For additional information, please contact AKC Government Relations at email@example.com or 919-816-3720.
View AKC’s online advocacy resources: