| CA Ear Cropping Ban Considered Once Again |
March
2005 |
Many concerned fanciers are by now aware that officials in West Hollywood,
California are considering a city ordinance to ban ear cropping, tail
docking and other non-therapeutic measures. AKC has been actively working
with California fanciers and parent clubs to oppose the measure. The
California Veterinary Medical Association (CVMA) shared AKC’s
concern over the proposed ordinance because they believe it to be in
violation of the state’s Veterinary Medical Practice Act. The
Act clearly states that local governments cannot enact legislation that
is already regulated by a state agency, as is the case with veterinary
medicine. Questions were raised as to whether passage of West Hollywood’s proposal could result in legal challenges against
the city.
In response to this situation, Asm. Paul Koretz, whose district includes
West Hollywood, has introduced AB418, a state bill to ban ear cropping.
Such legislation, if allowed to pass, would secure a ban on ear cropping
in West Hollywood—and indeed all over the state—and would
not be considered a violation of the Practice Act.
Fanciers in California and nationwide fought tirelessly last summer
to defeat a similar ear cropping bill. AB418 differs from that bill
in that it bans ear cropping only. It further addresses many of the
fancy’s 2004 concerns in that it does not prohibit showing, owning,
selling, buying or adopting a dog with cropped ears. This language was
almost certainly included in order to reduce opposition to the bill.
Some fanciers have questioned why they should oppose AB418 given the
exemptions noted above. “As long as I can own and show a cropped
dog, is there really a problem?” Yes, in fact there is. Once the
government decides ear cropping procedures should be banned, it is likely
that they will revisit the legality of simply owning a cropped dog in
the very near future. It won’t stop there, however. That’s because AB418 sets a dangerous negative precedent
by allowing the government to slowly have more and more control over
how responsible owners keep and enjoy their dogs. This slippery slope
may only address ear cropping today, but tail docking, spaying and neutering,
and a host of other issues will not be far behind. It is the principle,
not just the procedure, to which AKC and responsible fanciers must be
opposed. For more information on how you can help, please visit the
Legislative Alerts here
and here.
|